Buy vs build considerations
Last updated
Was this helpful?
Last updated
Was this helpful?
Buy: Purchasing a solution like Nalpeiron’s Zentitle allows your team to focus on your core product rather than diverting resources to develop and maintain a licensing system. This is ideal if licensing is not a strategic differentiator for your business.
Build: Developing in-house may make sense if licensing is integral to your competitive advantage or aligns with your core expertise.
Buy: Ready-made platforms like Zentitle are designed to be deployed quickly, often within days, enabling faster time-to-market for your products.
Build: Building in-house can take months or even years, delaying product launches and potentially losing market opportunities.
Buy: While buying involves upfront licensing fees, it typically reduces long-term costs associated with development, maintenance, and compliance updates.
Build: Building in-house can incur significant costs in development, ongoing maintenance, and ensuring compliance with evolving standards. These costs can escalate if the system requires frequent updates or scaling.
Buy: Commercial solutions like Zentitle are built to scale with your business and adapt to changing needs without requiring extensive rework.
Build: Custom-built systems may struggle to scale efficiently or adapt to new requirements unless significant resources are allocated for continuous improvement.
Buy: Off-the-shelf solutions often have built-in integrations for common platforms and APIs, simplifying deployment into existing ecosystems.
Build: Custom solutions may require additional effort to integrate with existing systems, especially if the architecture is complex or outdated.
Buy: Vendors like Nalpeiron handle ongoing updates, compliance requirements, and support, reducing the burden on your internal teams.
Build: Maintaining compliance with licensing standards and updating the system requires dedicated resources and expertise.